Prop. 13 FAQs
Prop. 13 FAQs
What is Prop. 13?
Proposition 13, or the People’s Initiative to Limit Property Taxation, was passed in 1978, stemming from concern over soaring property values and resulting in rising property taxes. It was championed by anti-tax activists Howard Jarvis and Paul Gann. Proposition 13 ensures valuations of property may not grow by more than 2% annually, and market value reassessment may only occur with a change of ownership. Additionally, Proposition 13 created the requirement that all state and local tax increases be approved by a two-thirds vote of the legislature or voting public.
Isn't Prop. 13 just for homeowners?
No. Most voters are unaware of this, but Prop. 13 applies to commercial property as well. This aspect of the law has led to significant unintended consequences. For example, Chevron alone is saving over $100 million a year by benefiting from Prop. 13's Corporate Loophole. On average homes change hands in California every 10 years while some large commercial properties rarely change hands, so are rarely reassessed. Because of this the property tax burden in California has shifted onto residential property owners. Before Prop.13, residential accounted for 55% of the property tax and commercial paid 45%. Now residential shoulders 72% of the tax burden while commercial only pays 28%.
Will reforming Prop. 13 affect homeowners?
This initiative will NOT change Prop. 13 for any residential property. Voters passed Prop. 13 to protect people, not corporate landowners.
What about apartments?
Apartments will not be affected either, nor residential renters of any kind. In mixed-use buildings, only the commercial part of the property will be reassessed at fair market value.
What about farms?
This initiative exempts all agricultural land.
What about small businesses?
This initiative exempts all property owned by small businesses owners that is worth less than $2 million. In addition, small businesses will be provided with direct tax relief through elimination of the tax on business equipment. This is a tax break worth $1 billion a year.
Won't this be bad for business in California?
No. The Prop. 13 Corporate Loophole doesn’t incentivize creating jobs or economic activity – it incentivizes land owners holding on to property for decades without doing anything productive with it. In fact, only 8% of commercial properties get 77% of the tax savings from this Corporate Loophole. Under the current system, two identical businesses side-by-side may pay drastically different property taxes. This penalizes new businesses by making them subsidize their established competitors’ property tax. By leveling the playing field and bringing a minority of older commercial properties up to fair market property tax rates, we will be creating a healthier and more competitive business climate.
Won't this cause businesses to leave California?
No. We are the only state in the country that does not regularly reassess commercial property. Most states actually tax their commercial property at a higher percentage than residential property. Texas, for instance, taxes their commercial property at 2.5% of fair market value. Our property tax rate will remain capped at 1%.
Won't businesses just pass the cost for goods and services down to consumers? Won't rents go up?
No. Large commercial property owners don’t share their Prop. 13 Corporate Loophole savings with consumers. Prices for goods and services are based on the market, not on the property taxes a business pays. Have you ever received a Prop. 13 discount from a gas station, store or for office space? The answer is no.
Throughout California there are examples of gas stations across the street from one another charging the same price for gas, despite one gas station paying ten times less in property taxes. The only thing California consumers get from the Prop. 13 Corporate Loophole are underfunded schools and community services as well as higher taxes and fees.
Will this change for commercial property happen all at once?
No, this reform will be gradually phased in over time starting with the oldest properties first.
Aren't there other loopholes that corporations exploit to avoid paying property tax?
Yes. Currently, commercial property owners can split up the purchase of a property amongst several parties in order to keep all ownership shares under 50%. By ensuring that no one entity owns more than 50% of a property, no property tax reassessment is triggered. One famous example is Michael Dell, the founder of Dell computers, who bought a hotel in Santa Monica for $200 million but was able to save a million a year in property taxes by splitting up the purchase between multiple people. By instituting regular reassessment of large commercial property, these tax evasions will no longer be possible because reassessment will occur every year regardless of the circumstances of the purchase.
Where will the new revenue from this reform go?
This will be local money that will stay local, and will not go to Sacramento. This is revenue that will fund our local schools, cities, counties, and special districts for services that we all rely on like health clinics, parks and roads.
In the 1970s, California was tied with New York for 5th in the nation in per-pupil education funding. Today New York spends twice what we do for education and we have the most crowded classrooms in the country. 40% of this revenue will go directly to our public schools.
The rest will go to our local governments that currently have no other choice than to levy regressive taxes and fees on individuals and small businesses just to make ends meet. Closing the Prop. 13 Corporate Loophole is the only way to restore over $11 billion a year to our schools and community services without increasing taxes on homeowners or renters.